In the conclusion of Episode Four of “The History of
School,” Diane Ravitch reminds us that “you can’t have excellence without
equity.” The American school
system seems to be torn between these two “goals,” with one often undermining
the other. In other words,
historically, the focus has shifted from equity to excellence with our nation’s
recurring need to “perform” and come out on top. Sure, we say that we want equal opportunity for all and we
make attempts to mirror this “belief” within our education system, but for
whatever reason, we seem to do a sub-par job when it comes to the actual
execution of establishing educational equity because our hunger for
“excellence” always gets the better of us. When will we finally stop flip-flopping between the two and pretending to place uniform emphasis on
both concepts and find ourselves at equilibrium? To be honest, I found the “educational trends” discussed in
this episode overwhelming. The
back-and-forth nature of our flawed system is exhausting, and it takes a toll
on students and teachers alike.
American education has had little stability over the years, and still we
are unsatisfied. For example,
while the concept of school choice and voucher programs may seem at first
appealing and as a way to provide all students with the power to direct their
education and encourage “equal opportunity,” such programs actually tend to
increase segregation and hamper equity by dividing students based on the types
of students they attract. Private
school also tend to take funding away from traditional public schools, and do
not address the root cause of why segregation occurs in the first place:
poverty and racial/ethnic differences. Other components of our education system, such as tracking,
also take away from equity among students. When will we begin to see that
sometimes our “best intentions” actually have some of the most negative
consequences?
No comments:
Post a Comment